The advancement of natural language processing (NLP) has expanded the application of AI-based text classification in the legal domain. However, accurately classifying legal documents remains a challenging task due to the complexity of legal texts and the subtle differences between legal categories. This study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of various legal text classification models, ranging from traditional machine learning techniques to state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), based on ten legal categories of sexual offense precedents. The experimental results demonstrate that fine-tuning small-scale models (Small LMs) such as KLUE-BERT on legal data yields superior performance compared to large general-purpose models such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0, as well as traditional machine learning models. In particular, KLUE-BERT achieved the highest accuracy of 99.3%, indicating that domain adaptation and fine-tuning play a more crucial role in legal document classification than model size alone. Furthermore, we employed explainable AI (XAI) techniques to analyze the model’s predictions and conduct an in-depth review of misclassification cases. XAI-based analysis allowed us to identify key linguistic features influencing model decisions and revealed limitations in the model’s ability to fully capture subtle textual cues. To further validate these findings, we leveraged KICS data, which closely resembles real-world legal case records, as a testbed to evaluate the model’s generalization capabilities. The results indicate that the model struggles to interpret implicit contextual cues within legal texts. These findings emphasize the necessity for both high performance and interpretability in legal AI models. By utilizing XAI, this study proposes methods to enhance transparency in legal text classification, contributing to ongoing discussions on the reliability and practical application of AI in legal contexts. Our research suggests that AI-assisted tools can effectively support legal professionals in tasks such as legal document classification, legal information retrieval, and case assessment.
KSP Keywords
Classification models, Comprehensive Evaluation, Contextual cues, Fine-tuning, High performance, Legal texts, Linguistic features, Machine Learning technique(MLT), Natural Language Processing(NLP), Real-world, Scale model
This work is distributed under the term of Creative Commons License (CCL)
(CC BY NC ND)
Copyright Policy
ETRI KSP Copyright Policy
The materials provided on this website are subject to copyrights owned by ETRI and protected by the Copyright Act. Any reproduction, modification, or distribution, in whole or in part, requires the prior explicit approval of ETRI. However, under Article 24.2 of the Copyright Act, the materials may be freely used provided the user complies with the following terms:
The materials to be used must have attached a Korea Open Government License (KOGL) Type 4 symbol, which is similar to CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License). Users are free to use the materials only for non-commercial purposes, provided that original works are properly cited and that no alterations, modifications, or changes to such works is made. This website may contain materials for which ETRI does not hold full copyright or for which ETRI shares copyright in conjunction with other third parties. Without explicit permission, any use of such materials without KOGL indication is strictly prohibited and will constitute an infringement of the copyright of ETRI or of the relevant copyright holders.
J. Kim et. al, "Trends in Lightweight Kernel for Many core Based High-Performance Computing", Electronics and Telecommunications Trends. Vol. 32, No. 4, 2017, KOGL Type 4: Source Indication + Commercial Use Prohibition + Change Prohibition
J. Sim et.al, “the Fourth Industrial Revolution and ICT – IDX Strategy for leading the Fourth Industrial Revolution”, ETRI Insight, 2017, KOGL Type 4: Source Indication + Commercial Use Prohibition + Change Prohibition
If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, or if you would like to request permission to use any material on this website, please feel free to contact us
KOGL Type 4:(Source Indication + Commercial Use Prohibition+Change Prohibition)
Contact ETRI, Research Information Service Section
Privacy Policy
ETRI KSP Privacy Policy
ETRI does not collect personal information from external users who access our Knowledge Sharing Platform (KSP). Unathorized automated collection of researcher information from our platform without ETRI's consent is strictly prohibited.
[Researcher Information Disclosure] ETRI publicly shares specific researcher information related to research outcomes, including the researcher's name, department, work email, and work phone number.
※ ETRI does not share employee photographs with external users without the explicit consent of the researcher. If a researcher provides consent, their photograph may be displayed on the KSP.